A recent article in the American Journal of Medical Quality by researchers from 3M, assisted by J. Graham Atkinson, DPhil, Executive Vice President for Research and Policy of the Foundation, raises concerns with Medicare’s current risk-adjustment model used for standardized infection ratios.
The authors looked at hospital intensive care units (ICU) and found great variation in reported ICU utilization among admissions for congestive heart failure with alarming data revealing that the designation of ICU versus non-ICU care was unrelated to patient severity.
The authors note that policy intended to reduce hospital-acquired infections is good and tying financial incentives to improvement appropriately sends a strong message that quality of care is important.
However, they question policy that can mislead patients and stakeholders on hospital performance and stress that when wide-spread variation is found in a program with billion-dollar payment adjustments, a formal review of risk-adjustment methods is urgently required.
Richard L Fuller, MS, John S Hughes, MD, Graham Atkinson, DPhil, Problematic Risk Adjustment in National Healthcare Safety Network Measures, American Journal of Medical Quality, June 2019.
The Jayne Koskinas Ted Giovanis Foundation for Health and Policy (JKTG Foundation) today announced funding to develop a prototype multiscale model designed to predict therapeutic responses of tumor ecosystems – a new frontier in breast cancer research.
The word “stakeholder” really bothers me particularly in the healthcare space. I’m struck by a quote by Ken Burns.
“The thing that I’ve learned is that there is no ‘them.’ This is what everybody does: make a distinction about ‘them.’ It’s just ‘us’.”
In racing, we measure this in lap times often down to the second or tenths of a second. A recent racing article provoked me to think about the pursuit of “the last tenth” of a second in improvement which is typically the toughest and most difficult to attain.