The word “stakeholder” really bothers me particularly in the healthcare space. I’m struck by a quote by Ken Burns.
“The thing that I’ve learned is that there is no ‘them.’ This is what everybody does: make a distinction about ‘them.’ It’s just ‘us’.”
To me, the word stakeholder creates an us versus them scenario. Perhaps the intent is to imply that we are all stakeholders in the health care system. But to me, the term conjures up differences, finger pointing, turf, etc. not commonalities.
It’s divisive…isolating.. It’s different than the word shareholder. A shareholder implies common interest, shared focus, co-ownership, or uniting objective like caring for patients.
I think we need to stick with the Ken Burns’ view – it’s just “us” as that might get us farther than where we are today. Together, we can solve things but as stakeholders, with differing or perhaps divergent interests, we won’t get as far – in fact, we’ll quickly get nowhere.
Featured news
Ted’s Take: It’s about the money
Money is what seems to drive things and money is what seems to drive organizations too. They all start with an overriding moral goal but after a while things often turn toward more money.
Ted’s Take: The best patient advocate? You.
When you’re a patient, you are kind of vulnerable. You have a problem, are often sketchy about what it is and the potential treatment or therapy needed. The bigger the problem, the more vulnerable you are. This makes you a perfect advocate.
Targeting effective treatments for triple-negative breast cancer
The JKTG Foundation recently awarded funding to Laura Heiser, Ph.D., Associate Professor and Vice Chair of Biomedical Engineering at the Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) School of Medicine, to develop a prototype multiscale model designed to predict therapeutic responses of tumor ecosystems – a new frontier in breast cancer research.
Jayne Koskinas Ted Giovanis
Foundation for Health and Policy
PO Box 130
Highland, Maryland 20777
Media contact: 202.548.0133